Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com> writes:
> On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 5:38 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> 1. I'm still unhappy about the loop that fills the count histogram,
>> as I noted earlier today. It at least needs a decent comment and some
>> overflow protection, and I'm not entirely convinced that it doesn't have
>> more bugs than the overflow issue.
> Attached patch is focused on fixing this. The "frac" variable overflow is
> evaded by making it int64. I hope comments is clarifying something. In
> general this loop copies behaviour of histogram constructing loop of
> compute_scalar_stats function. But instead of values array we've array of
> unique DEC and it's frequency.
OK, I reworked this a bit and committed it. Thanks.
regards, tom lane