Re: [GENERAL] Shouldn't B'1' = 1::bit be true?
| От | Thomas Swan | 
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [GENERAL] Shouldn't B'1' = 1::bit be true? | 
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 48135.199.222.14.2.1078960735.squirrel@www.idigx.com обсуждение исходный текст  | 
		
| Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] Shouldn't B'1' = 1::bit be true? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) | 
| Список | pgsql-hackers | 
<quote who="Tom Lane"> > "Thomas Swan" <tswan@idigx.com> writes: >> To convert low bits ot high bits you pad 0 bits on the left. To >> convert >> from high to low you strip bits off the left hand side. This allows >> reasonable behavior. > > Unfortunately, the SQL spec is perfectly clear that you pad or strip > zero bits on the *right* of the bit string. We cannot change that. > I was completely unaware of that fact. *must dig a deeper hole* > It might have been better if we had defined int<->bit casts to treat > the first bit of the bit string as the LSB of the integer. But we > didn't, and it's probably too big a change to consider. > It would be a big change at least in the 7.x series. Maybe the change could be tabled to an 8.x release. Thomas
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: