Re: [GENERAL] Shouldn't B'1' = 1::bit be true?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Thomas Swan
Тема Re: [GENERAL] Shouldn't B'1' = 1::bit be true?
Дата
Msg-id 48135.199.222.14.2.1078960735.squirrel@www.idigx.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [GENERAL] Shouldn't B'1' = 1::bit be true?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
<quote who="Tom Lane">
> "Thomas Swan" <tswan@idigx.com> writes:
>> To convert low bits ot high bits you pad 0 bits on the left.   To
>> convert
>> from high to low you strip bits off the left hand side.  This allows
>> reasonable behavior.
>
> Unfortunately, the SQL spec is perfectly clear that you pad or strip
> zero bits on the *right* of the bit string.  We cannot change that.
>

I was completely unaware of that fact. *must dig a deeper hole*

> It might have been better if we had defined int<->bit casts to treat
> the first bit of the bit string as the LSB of the integer.  But we
> didn't, and it's probably too big a change to consider.
>

It would be a big change at least in the 7.x series.  Maybe the change
could be tabled to an 8.x release.

Thomas



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: selective statement logging
Следующее
От: Jonathan Gardner
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: How to get RelationName ??