Re: Patch for Prevent pg_dump/pg_restore from being affected by statement_timeout

Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
>> I agree that we should do that, but the thread on -hackers ("Autovacuum
>> vs statement_timeout") wasn't totally conclusive. Greg Sabine Mullane
>> and Peter Eisentraut argued that we shouldn't, but neither provided a
>> plausible use case where a statement_timeout on restoring a dump would
>> be useful. I'm thinking we should apply the patch unless someone comes
>> up with one.
> 
> I don't think it's fair to simply discard the use cases provided as
> "implausible" and demand one more to your liking.

Sorry if I missed it in the original thread, but what is the use case 
you have in mind?

--   Heikki Linnakangas  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com