Re: [PATCHES] libpq type system 0.9a

Tom Lane wrote:
> 
> The key phrase in that being "some way or another".  Red Hat works with
> a concept of core vs extras (or another way to look at it being what
> comes on the CDs vs what you have to download from someplace).  I think
> it's highly likely that libpgtypes would end up in extras.  If you do
> not make it possible to package it that way (ie, separately from libpq),
> it's more likely that it won't get packaged at all than that it will be
> put in core.
> 
>             regards, tom lane
> 
> 

I'll buy this.  Better to be safe then sorry.  This patch becomes more 
flexible and distributable when separated.

-- 
Andrew Chernow
eSilo, LLC
every bit counts
http://www.esilo.com/