Re: [PATCHES] libpq type system 0.9a

Tom Lane wrote:
> Better support for arrays and composites is certainly something that
> people might want, but the problem with this design is that it forces
> them to buy into a number of other decisions that they don't necessarily
> want.
>
> I could see adding four functions to libpq that create and parse
> the textual representations of arrays and records.
>
>             
>   

Well, that was the part that interested me, so let me now speak up in 
favor of better array/record support in libpq.

cheers

andrew