Re: slow pgsql tables - need to vacuum?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Craig Ringer
Тема Re: slow pgsql tables - need to vacuum?
Дата
Msg-id 47F90D1B.4000306@postnewspapers.com.au
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: slow pgsql tables - need to vacuum?  ("Douglas McNaught" <doug@mcnaught.org>)
Ответы Re: slow pgsql tables - need to vacuum?
Список pgsql-general
Douglas McNaught wrote:

> You need to ANALYZE the tables after you load them, and make sure you
> have indexes on the column you're querying (which it sounds like you
> do, but they're not being used because the statistics for the table
> are inaccurate).

I've seen discussion here that made it sound like a REINDEX might also
be required on tables with really high data churn (ie when VACUUM /
VACUUM FULL are run a lot) - if you're not dropping and re-creating the
indexes for better bulk load performance anyway, of course. Am I just
confused, or can this sometimes be necessary?

--
Craig Ringer

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Craig Ringer
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Silent install 8.3 diiffers from 8.2
Следующее
От: Craig Ringer
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pl/pgsql RECORD data type, how to access to the values