Chris Browne wrote:
...
>
> pg_ctl is really more like the scripts in /etc/init.d; whatever it
> "ought" to be called instead, I don't think "safe_postgresqld" is
> it...
eek. where is that save_ something coming from? Apache uses
apachectl which seems pretty forward - pg_ctl seems to be in
the same spirit. Naming it pgctl could simplify typing and
making it a wrapper (similar to zopectl :-) with
start/stop/status/debug/run ... could have some benefit.
Regards
Tino