Re: Script binaries renaming

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andrew Dunstan
Тема Re: Script binaries renaming
Дата
Msg-id 47EA4C1D.8090909@dunslane.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Script binaries renaming  (Zdeněk Kotala <Zdenek.Kotala@Sun.COM>)
Список pgsql-hackers

Zdeněk Kotala wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan napsal(a):
>>
>>
>> Zdeněk Kotala wrote:
>>> Question is also how many users really use these commands. For 
>>> example vacuumdb is not too important now when we have autovacuum.
>>
>> This is not true. Plenty of apps will quite reasonably choose to 
>> follow large batch updates by a single vacuumdb rather than using 
>> autovacuum.
>
> Yes, up to 8.2, but I think situation for 8.3 could be different. We 
> have more works, autovacuum is better and so on.
>
>

Again, this is just not true. It might not be a situation you run  
across, but autovacuum does not suit all needs. This includes 8.3.

cheers

andrew


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Zdeněk Kotala
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Script binaries renaming
Следующее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [DOCS] pg_total_relation_size() and CHECKPOINT