Re: VACUUM ANALYZE -vs- ANALYZE on an insert-only table.
| От | Matt Gordon |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: VACUUM ANALYZE -vs- ANALYZE on an insert-only table. |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 47BC08C8E02BA54EBD901AB9328BFBC09F10E4@exchtwo обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | VACUUM ANALYZE -vs- ANALYZE on an insert-only table. ("Matt Gordon" <m.gordon@f5.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
That's what I suspected. Thanks Bruno. -----Original Message----- From: Bruno Wolff III [mailto:bruno@wolff.to] Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 1:38 PM To: Matt Gordon Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [GENERAL] VACUUM ANALYZE -vs- ANALYZE on an insert-only table. On Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 15:26:56 -0800, Matt Gordon <m.gordon@f5.com> wrote: > If I have a table that I only use for INSERTs and queries (no UPDATEs or DELETEs), is it enough to just run ANALYZE onthe table instead of VACUUM ANALYZE? In other words, is running a VACUUM on a table useful if all that you're doing isINSERTing into it? My understanding of VACUUM is that it cleans up stale tuples that are left after UPDATEs and DELETEs. > You only need to vacuum if you do updates, deletes or when you need to handle wrap around of transaction IDs (about every 10^9 transactions).
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: