Re: SELECT CAST(123 AS char) -> 1

Andrew Sullivan wrote:

>
> No, you're trying to convey that it is more benign/useful _to you_.  Others
> are arguing that they want to write conformant code, and don't much care
> what MyOccasionallyReadTheSpec does.  It's a pity that SQL conformance is
> not better across systems, but surely the way to improve that is to reduce
> the number of products that are being careless, not to increase them?
>

Let's leave it as-is then. We'll conform to the spec, and this good
since someone may want to extract the leftmost char from a base-10
number representation.

Henceforth SELECT CAST(123 AS char) will and should undisputedly return '1'.