Re: pg_dump additional options for performance
| От | Andrew Dunstan |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: pg_dump additional options for performance |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 47B069E8.3020303@dunslane.net обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: pg_dump additional options for performance (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: pg_dump additional options for performance
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera wrote: > --multidump-prefix=foobar > and it creates foobar.1.predata, foobar.2.data, foobar.3.postdata > > or something like that? The number would help to sort them > appropriately, and the string would ensure that you know what each file > is ... perhaps we could have %-escapes in the name to expand to both of > these? Perhaps we could have other %-escapes for things like database > name --- so you could say --multidump-filename=%d.%n.%t.dump ... but > then it would be nice to have strftime escapes too. > > Or is this too complex? > Yes, I think it is. We do not have to be infinitely flexible. KISS seems apposite. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: