Re: [Cert] Re: PostgreSQL Certification
| От | Dan Langille |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [Cert] Re: PostgreSQL Certification |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 47A86E51.6090605@langille.org обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [Cert] Re: PostgreSQL Certification ("Stéphane A. Schildknecht"<stephane.schildknecht@postgresqlfr.org>) |
| Список | pgsql-advocacy |
I have seriously trimmed the To/CC fields and remove cert@ Please stop cross posting between the lists. Stéphane A. Schildknecht wrote: > We all agree. So the questions ramaining are : > - what should be in the certification program > - is an MCQ significant enough ? > - are there people willing to watch every attendee answers or is > possible to have an automatic processing of answers ? > - who will decide who's smart enough to write questions and test ? I think this answers your questions: http://lists.postgresqlcertification.org/pipermail/cert/2008-February/000067.html Further discussion should be directed to the cert list, as previously suggested. -- Dan Langille - http://www.langille.org/ BSDCan - The Technical BSD Conference: http://www.bsdcan.org/ PGCon - The PostgreSQL Conference: http://www.pgcon.org/
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: