Re: pgsql: configure tag'd 8.3.0 and built witih autoconf 2.59
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgsql: configure tag'd 8.3.0 and built witih autoconf 2.59 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 47A752A3.3050909@hagander.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pgsql: configure tag'd 8.3.0 and built witih autoconf 2.59 (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Список | pgsql-committers |
Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > > Bruce Momjian wrote: >> Andrew Dunstan wrote: >> >>> Bruce Momjian wrote: >>> >>>> Andrew Dunstan wrote: >>>> >>>>> I don't see the branch point for REL8_3_STABLE - has that been >>>>> done? I thought it would happen at the same time as we tagged the >>>>> release. >>>>> >>>> No, we will branch later. >>>> >>>> >>> Still not there. >>> >>> We need this to be created before buildfarm members can start testing >>> 8.3. >>> >>> I still don't see why we wait to create the branch after tagging the >>> release. There doesn't seem to be any point. >>> >> >> We need an 8.3 tag, but not a branch. Is there no tag? >> >> We don't branch because we want to apply 8.3 fixes to CVS HEAD for a >> while, to avoid double-patching. >> >> > > I give up. We seem to look for ways to make things more difficult > sometimes. We are hampering the buildfarm, and keeping the tree frozen, > and thus preventing feature commits, on the off chance that there will > be some bug fix that we don't want to double patch. We backport fixes > all the time. Why is it such a big deal? Are we waiting for magic pixie > dust? > > When we released 8.2, my archives show that HEAD was stamped as 8.3devel > the same day. That also doesn't seem to have been done yet, but anyway, > the branch for _STABLE must have been done before that time. +1 on getting the branch + stamping done ASAP. //Magnus
В списке pgsql-committers по дате отправления: