Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUCvariable

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Ron Mayer
Тема Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUCvariable
Дата
Msg-id 479FA1A9.1060200@cheapcomplexdevices.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUCvariable  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUCvariable  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> writes:
>   
>> Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: 
>>     
>>> Or is someone prepared to argue that there are no applications out
>>> there that will be broken if the same query, against the same unchanging
>>> table, yields different results from one trial to the next? 
>>>       
Won't even autovacuum "analyze" cause this too if the
new stats changes the plan?

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Cristian Gafton
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Large pgstat.stat file causes I/O storm
Следующее
От: Caleb Welton
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Transition functions for SUM(::int2), SUM(::int4, SUM(::int8])