Re: Report: removing the inconsistencies in our CVS->git conversion

I wrote:
> Something in the rsync process thinks that ignoring subdirectories
> named "core" is a good idea.  I'm a bit surprised nobody ever noticed
> these were missing from anoncvs before ...

That's because they aren't.  It's the -C switch in your rsync call
that's at fault.  (And this demonstrates why comparing against checkouts
from the same CVS repo isn't an end-to-end test :-()
        regards, tom lane