Dave Page wrote:
> Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Please review the following changes, patch is also attached:
>>>
>>> http://69.34.217.90/about/sponsors
>> Getting back to this one...
>>
>> Is there any reason we should group this by country at all? Today we
>> group by country without showing it, which is the worst possible
>> combination, IMHO. JD's patch changes it so we properly show that we're
>> grouping it by country. But why *are* we grouping it my country in the
>> first place? This is sponsors to the Global Development Group, why do we
>> care about what country they're in that much? I think we should just
>> re-order them alphabetically, and keep the country column where it is
>> now (when it's ordered alphabetically, it makes sense to keep it there)...
>
> +1
I am fine with that as well. My patch was only to create a logical order
based on the current sort. Obviously alphabetical makes more sense as a
whole and I am 100% behind that.
Would you like me to submit a patch for that or will you handle it?
Joshua D. Drake
>
> /D
>