Re: With 4 disks should I go for RAID 5 or RAID 10

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Mark Mielke
Тема Re: With 4 disks should I go for RAID 5 or RAID 10
Дата
Msg-id 4773C3AE.1060602@mark.mielke.cc
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: With 4 disks should I go for RAID 5 or RAID 10  (Bill Moran <wmoran@collaborativefusion.com>)
Ответы Re: With 4 disks should I go for RAID 5 or RAID 10
Список pgsql-performance
Bill Moran wrote:
In response to Mark Mielke <mark@mark.mielke.cc>:
 
Bill Moran wrote:   
I'm fairly sure that FreeBSD's GEOM does.  Of course, it couldn't be doing
consistency checking at that point.     
According to this:

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=gmirror&apropos=0&sektion=8&manpath=FreeBSD+6-current&format=html

There is a -b (balance) option that seems pretty clear that it does not 
read from all drives if it does not have to:   
>From where did you draw that conclusion?  Note that the "split" algorithm
(which is the default) divides requests up among multiple drives.  I'm
unclear as to how you reached a conclusion opposite of what the man page
says -- did you test and find it not to work? 
Perhaps you and I are speaking slightly different languages? :-) When I say "does not read from all drives", I mean "it will happily read from any of the drives to satisfy the request, and allows some level of configuration as to which drive it will select. It does not need to read all of the drives to satisfy the request."

Cheers,
mark

-- 
Mark Mielke <mark@mielke.cc>

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Jared Mauch
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_dump performance
Следующее
От: Greg Smith
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: More shared buffers causes lower performances