Re: Spoofing as the postmaster

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Magnus Hagander
Тема Re: Spoofing as the postmaster
Дата
Msg-id 476ECA7E.10604@hagander.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Spoofing as the postmaster  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Spoofing as the postmaster  (Tomasz Ostrowski <tometzky@batory.org.pl>)
Re: Spoofing as the postmaster  (Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
>> Am I missing something here, or did you just post
>> a piece of configure that *agreed* with what I said? ;-)
> 
> Maybe I misread what you said.  I thought you were claiming that mysql
> do this more securely than we do; which they don't.  But looking back,
> 
>>>> It's certainly the default on my SQL Servers. And Sybase. AFAIK it's the
>>>> default on MySQL,
> 
> it seems it's not too clear which case you meant by "it".

My bad, then. Probably didn't quote enough :-)

My point is that all these other server products have the exact same
issue. And that they deal with it the exact same we do - pretty much
leave it up to the guy who configure the server to realize that's just
how things work.

I'm just surprised that people are actually surprised by this. To me,
it's just a natural fact that happens to pretty much all systems. And a
good reason not to let arbitrary users run processes that can bind to
something on your server.

//Magnus


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Spoofing as the postmaster
Следующее
От: Kurt Roeckx
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Spoofing as the postmaster