Re: Sorting performance vs. MySQL
| От | Frank Heikens |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Sorting performance vs. MySQL |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 475A81B1-52E6-4DAE-B72B-142B0E3464F7@mac.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Sorting performance vs. MySQL (Yang Zhang <yanghatespam@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Sorting performance vs. MySQL
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
Op 22 feb 2010, om 20:28 heeft Yang Zhang het volgende geschreven:
>
>
>>
>>
>>>> If your work-mem is too low there's a good chance that Postgres
>>>> has to
>>>> use your disks for sorting, which will obviously be quite slow.
>>>
>>> Relative to the non-terminating 80-minute-so-far sort, Unix sort
>>> runs
>>> much faster (on the order of several minutes).
>>
>> Make sure your index does fit into memory, what's the size of the
>> index?
>
> How might I find out the size and whether it's being fit in memory?
SELECT pg_size_pretty(pg_relation_size('i_transactionid'));
> --
> Yang Zhang
> http://www.mit.edu/~y_z/
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Frank Heikens
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: