Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> One thing that's important though - if we do change this, we need to
>> recategorise people at the same time. We can't just rename "major" to
>> "recent" and then move people around at a later time.
>
> In general I think that Active/Major is applicable and replaceable on
> the current list. There are certainly omissions Stefan for example
> which need to be remedied but I think everyone could agree that those
> changes could be submitted shortly after the patch is accepted.
>
> My primary concern is the removal of the word developer. I would be
> reasonably happy with "Major contributors", "Minor contributor".
I'm fine with that. And I agree that we need to recognise
non-developer-contributors. Either by renaming it to contributors, or by
creating separate sections for developers and "other contributors". But
creating separate sections creates the problem of how to deal with
people who are both. So I think renaming it is a good solution.
//Magnus