Re: [PATCHES] Partition: use triggers instead of rules

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes:
>>>> Rules are extremely slow in comparisons and not anywhere near as
>>>> flexible. As I said up post yesterday... they work well in the basic
>>>> partitioning configuration but anything else they are extremely deficient.
>>> I think that the above claim is exceedingly narrow-minded.
>> We are talking about partitioning. It is supposed to be narrow-minded.
>
> Sure, but look at all the confusion we have had just on this list about
> it.  We had better state why triggers should be used in place of rules
> _for_ _partitioning_ or that confusion will continue.

Sure I have no problem with that.

Joshua D. Drake