Michael Paesold wrote:
> NikhilS wrote:
>> <note><para>If you have a partitioning setup that uses rules please
>> refer to the 8.2 documentation on partitioning</para></note>
>>
>> +1
>
> I would also add another sentence about *why* the recommendation was
> changed. We have one rule-based setup here, and it has been working
> flawlessly for us,... so personally I don't even know the reasons.
>
Rules are extremely slow in comparisons and not anywhere near as
flexible. As I said up post yesterday... they work well in the basic
partitioning configuration but anything else they are extremely deficient.
Joshua D. Drake
> Best Regards
> Michael Paesold
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>