tmp wrote:
>> what exactly is that
>> "random_number" column
>
> A random float that is initialized when the row is created and never
> modified afterwards. The physical row ordering will clearly not match
> the random_number ordering. However, other queries uses a row ordering
> by the primary key so I don't think it would make much sense to make the
> index on random_number a clustering index just in order to speed up this
> single query.
>
>> and why are you desirous of ordering by it?
>
> In order to simulate a random pick of K rows. See [1].
A trick that I used is to sample the random column once, and create a much smaller table of the first N rows, where N
isthe sample size you want, and use that.
If you need a different N samples each time, you can create a temporary table, put your random N rows into that, do an
ANALYZE,and then join to this smaller table. The overall performance can be MUCH faster even though you're creating
andpopulating a whole table, than the plan that Postgres comes up with. This seems wrong-headed (why shouldn't Postgres
beable to be as efficient on its own?), but it works.
Craig