Re: [pgsql-www] Time to update list of contributors
| От | Kevin Grittner |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [pgsql-www] Time to update list of contributors |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 474D602F.EE98.0025.0@wicourts.gov обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: [pgsql-www] Time to update list of contributors (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [pgsql-www] Time to update list of contributors
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
>>> On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 11:34 AM, in message <474DA6C1.4070605@hagander.net>, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: > We don't generally add anybody who just provides a single patch, ever. > They go in the release notes, but we only add people who've been around > for a while to this list at all. I'm not sure what the point of the list is, but I had assumed that one reason for publishing it was to show the scope of the community. Wouldn't advocacy be better served by listing all the contributors, even those who have contributed for the first time in that release? Is there some risk there that I'm missing, a matter of the effort to gather the information, or to avoid offending more regular contributors? -Kevin
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: