Re: How to keep a table in memory?

Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>
>>> FYI, Postgres is know to be used successfully on some *extremely* heavy
>>> websites, without using tables pinned in memory.
>>>
>>
>> +1
>
> I give this a +/- 1. Yes extremely heavy websites can do this *but* 
> they require extremely expensive hardware to do so.
>
>

I expect extremely heavy websites to require extremely expensive 
equipment regardless of the software they use. Cost was not the issue 
raised by the OP.

cheers

andrew
>
>