Scott Marlowe wrote:
> On Nov 12, 2007 11:01 AM, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>> Scott Marlowe wrote:
>>> So, between the first and second vacuum you had a long running
>>> transaction that finally ended and let you clean up the dead rows.
>> No, before 8.3, CLUSTER throws away non-removable dead tuples. So the
>> long running transaction might still be there.
>
> Wow, good to know. Why would it have changed in 8.3? Was it
> considered broken behaviour?
I certainly considered it broken, though it was a known issue all along.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com