Re: Curious about dead rows.

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jean-David Beyer
Тема Re: Curious about dead rows.
Дата
Msg-id 47360D16.7070107@verizon.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Curious about dead rows.  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Ответы Re: Curious about dead rows.
Список pgsql-performance
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Nov 2007 13:38:23 -0500 Jean-David Beyer
> <jeandavid8@verizon.net> wrote:
>
>>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>>> Jean-David Beyer <jeandavid8@verizon.net> writes:
>>>>> I am doing lots of INSERTs on a table that starts out empty (I
>>>>> did a TRUNCATE on it). I am not, AFAIK, doing DELETEs or UPDATEs.
>>>>>  Autovacuum is on. I moved logging up to debug2 level to see what
>>>>>  was going on, and I get things like this: "vl_as": scanned 3000
>>>>> of 5296 pages, containing 232944 live rows and 1033 dead rows;
>>>>> 3000 rows in sample, 411224 estimated total rows A little later,
>>>>> it says: "vl_as": scanned 3000 of 6916 pages, containing 233507
>>>>> live rows and 493 dead rows; 3000 rows in sample, 538311
>>>>> estimated total rows
>>>> Well, *something* is doing deletes or updates in that table.
>>>> Better look a bit harder at your application ...
>>>>
>>> OK, you agree that if I am doing only INSERTs, that there should not
>>> be any dead rows. Therefore, I _must_ be doing deletes or updates.
>>>
>>> But the program is pretty simple, and I see no UPDATEs or DELETEs. I
>>> searched all the program source files (that contain none of them) and
>>>  all the libraries I have written, and they have none either. Right
>>> now the programs are not to the state where UPDATEs or DELETEs are
>>> required (though they will be later). I am still developing them and
>>> it is easier to just restore from backup or start over from the
>>> beginning since most of the changes are data laundering from an
>>> ever-increasing number of spreadsheets.
>>>
>>> Am I right that TRUNCATE deletes all the rows of a table. They may
>>> then be still there, but would not autovacuum clean out the dead
>>> rows? Or maybe it has not gotten to them yet? I could do an explicit
>>> one earlier.
>
> Truncate will not create dead rows. However ROLLBACK will. Are you
> getting any duplicate key errors or anything like that when you insert?
>
On the mistaken assumption that TRUNCATE left dead rows, I did a
VACUUM FULL ANALYZE before running the program full of INSERTs. This did not
make any difference.

As far as ROLLBACK are concerned, every one is immediately preceded by a
message output to the standard error file, and no such messages are produced.

--
  .~.  Jean-David Beyer          Registered Linux User 85642.
  /V\  PGP-Key: 9A2FC99A         Registered Machine   241939.
 /( )\ Shrewsbury, New Jersey    http://counter.li.org
 ^^-^^ 14:50:01 up 18 days, 8:08, 5 users, load average: 5.23, 5.35, 5.34

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Joshua D. Drake"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Curious about dead rows.
Следующее
От: "Scott Marlowe"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Curious about dead rows.