Re: Proposal: real procedures again (8.4)
| От | James Mansion |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Proposal: real procedures again (8.4) |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 47265F8C.5010400@mansionfamily.plus.com обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Proposal: real procedures again (8.4) (Josh Berkus <Josh.Berkus@Sun.COM>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Proposal: real procedures again (8.4)
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Josh Berkus wrote: > Not only would they be generally useful for SP programming, but multisets > would eliminate one of the big hurdles in re-writing T-SQL stored > procedures in PG, and thus make it easier to port from SQL Server. You > don't hear a lot of demand for multisets on the mailing lists because > we're not getting those SQL Server / Sybase crossovers now. > Its true that multiple result sets are a big deal with T-SQL programming: but I think you'll also need to provide a way for the locking model to behave in a similar way and also very importantly to be able to emulate the after-statement triggers view of new and old images. James
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: