Re: Potential inconsistency in handling of timestamps

Oliver Jowett wrote:

> Null values should in theory get handled and returned well before
> TimestampUtils ever gets invoked (see
> AbstractJdbc2ResultSet.getTimestamp()). Can you supply a testcase
> demonstrating the problem?

Actually, it looks like this was fixed in AbstractJdbc2ResultSet r1.95
(I was looking at CVS HEAD) but not on the 8.2 branch.

Try the 8.3-dev driver or a CVS build?

-O