Re: MaxOffsetNumber versus MaxHeapTuplesPerPage
| От | Heikki Linnakangas |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: MaxOffsetNumber versus MaxHeapTuplesPerPage |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 47206D12.6080600@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | MaxOffsetNumber versus MaxHeapTuplesPerPage (Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek.Kotala@Sun.COM>) |
| Ответы |
Re: MaxOffsetNumber versus MaxHeapTuplesPerPage
Re: MaxOffsetNumber versus MaxHeapTuplesPerPage |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Zdenek Kotala wrote: > Is there any reason to have both these macros? By my opinion > MaxHeapTuplesPerPage is more accurate and it should replace all > MaxOffsetNumber occurrence. We use MaxOffsetNumber with index pages as well. At quick glance, the only places I can see where we could replace MaxOffsetNumber with MaxHeapTuplesPerPage, are in vacuum.c and vacuumlazy.c, where we allocate arrays big enough to hold potentially a full page's worth of tuples. We could change those, but it's hardly worth the trouble. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: