Re: Vacuum related question
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Vacuum related question |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4715.1095523584@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Vacuum related question ("G. Thomas Yagel, Jr." <tyagel@yahoo.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
"G. Thomas Yagel, Jr." <tyagel@yahoo.com> writes:
> After 12 hours I stopped inserting recods and started a "vacuum verbose".
> The vacuuming has taken almost 2 hours now and is not even finished. What I
> don't understand is why there is so much vacuuming to be done on some tables
> that are only being inserted into. As an example, I have pasted the output
> from the vacuuming of the pg_largeobject table.
You may think you've only inserted, but this output says differently:
> INFO: "pg_largeobject": found 18317486 removable, 21326336 nonremovable row
> versions in 2119638 pages
Those 18 million dead rows didn't appear out of nowhere; they could only
have come from deleting or updating large objects (BLOBs).
The reason for the multiple index-cleaning cycles is that vacuum_mem was
only high enough to remember about 1.4 million dead rows at a time.
You could have sped up the process by setting vacuum_mem higher.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: