Re: statement caching link on jdbc page

Kris Jurka wrote:
> I think this is a good idea, but I would include a link to JDBC4 as well
> because despite our poor support it is the way of the future.

Ok.

> I hoping we fold in the copy stuff so that disappears and until we have
> some actual documentation/experience with the statement caching version,
> I'm not sure how prominently I would like to promote it.

I reduced that to just mentioning the extras page. Or should i remove it
completely?

> Yeah, since we don't even maintain 7.X anymore, mentioning 6.X and 0.2
> is a little pointless.

There are two tables now, supported versions and archived versions. Is
the split ok?


Till