Re: invalidly encoded strings

Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>   
>> Are you wanting this done for 8.3? If so, by whom? :-)
>>     
>
> [ shrug... ]  I'm not the one who's worried about closing all the holes
> leading to encoding problems.
>
>             
>   

I can certainly have a go at it. Are we still talking about Oct 1 for a 
possible beta?

cheers

andrew