Re: stonebraker diffs RDBMS
От | Brian Hurt |
---|---|
Тема | Re: stonebraker diffs RDBMS |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 46E68B44.8090503@janestcapital.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | stonebraker diffs RDBMS (Robert Bernier <robert.bernier5@sympatico.ca>) |
Ответы |
Re: stonebraker diffs RDBMS
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Robert Bernier wrote: >Two links here, comments anybody? > >http://www.computerworlduk.com/technology/applications/databases/news/index.cfm?newsid=5059 > >http://www.databasecolumn.com/ > >Robert > > > OK, I'm being stupid here- can someone please explain to me the difference between a column-oriented database and a fully normalized row-oriented database? Most databases are insufficiently normalized, this I know (including mine). And this causes pain. But it seems to me that full normalized (aka column-oriented) databases also cause pain, just a different type of pain. Collecting rows I'm very likely to all want together onto the same page strikes me as being a signifigant performance advantage. Having to read in a page for every column- or worse yet, O(log N) pages for each column (as I have to traverse an index)- strikes me as being a huge performance hit. But maybe I'm not seeing something, and someone can enlighten me. Brian
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: