Merlin Moncure wrote:
> On 8/31/07, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
>> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>>
>>> Here's a patch (minus catalog bump) which I think does that.
>>>
>> Looks sane in a very quick once-over, but I didn't test it.
>>
>
> works fine (here was my test). thanks for quick resolution to this
> issue. strings returned in binary format is IMO ok.
>
>
>
Patch applied (with catalog bump).
cheers
andrew