Re: Incomprehensible dogged sort in Merge Join

Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Aleksandr Vinokurov escribió:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
> 
>>> When criticizing planner deficiencies, it's considered polite to use
>>> something that's less than two major releases back ;-)
>> Sorry, it was blown out from my head at the end of composing: my version is 
>> 8.0.1, not so old, IMHO.
> 
> It _is_ quite old, yes.  Try 8.2 at the very least, but in some cases
> you're going to get "current CVS HEAD does it better", so if you want to
> suggest improvements to the planner you should be really looking into
> that.
> 

I understood my fault :)

Guys, please forgive my dodge.
Aleksandr.