int8 & INT64_IS_BUSTED

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Florian G. Pflug
Тема int8 & INT64_IS_BUSTED
Дата
Msg-id 46D5D9E3.8030505@phlo.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: int8 & INT64_IS_BUSTED  (Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>)
Re: int8 & INT64_IS_BUSTED  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Hi

I'm confused about whether int8s work on a machine on which
INT64_IS_BUSTED. My reading of the code suggests that int8
will be available, but be, well, busted in such a machine.

For example, int8mul seems as if I'd just return the wrong
answer on such a machine.

Or are platforms with INT64_IS_BUSTED no longer supported,
and are all those #ifdefs only legacy code?

Please enlighten a poor linux+gcc user who can't remember
ever using a compiler without a "long long" datatype after
leaving TurboC under DOS.

greetings, Florian Pflug


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [DOCS] Contrib modules documentation online
Следующее
От: Oleg Bartunov
Дата:
Сообщение: text search function renaming