Decibel! wrote:
> The advantage to Bruce's idea is that it sounds pretty simple to
> implement. While it wouldn't be of use for many general cases, it
> *would* be useful for read-only tables, ie: old partitions.
Wouldn't the mostcommon case by foreign key checks against tables that
essentially map application enums to display strings? This is a rather
common scenario. It would be nice if such tables (which are typically
small) could be retained in each backend process with a simple check
that the cached data is still valid.
James