Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Is enlarging the xid field something we should consider for 8.4? Is the
> autovacuum I/O less then the extra I/O needed for an expanded xid fields
> on every row?
I doubt that's going to happen...
Maybe we can do something to reduce the xid consumption? For example,
reuse xids for read-only queries.
-- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com