Re: MVCC cons
| От | Ron Johnson |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: MVCC cons |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 46C25E06.9000709@cox.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: MVCC cons ("Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure@gmail.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 08/14/07 20:36, Merlin Moncure wrote: [snip] > > PostgreSQL wins in terms of better concurrency (especially in long > transactions or transactions that touch a lot of records), cheap > rollbacks, and all the advantages of a sophisticated locking engine > (transactional ddl for example). Although MVCC is not a /sine qua non/ of transactional ddl. - -- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson LA USA Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day. Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good! -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGwl4GS9HxQb37XmcRAhm5AJ9pSZR08Vj5aOYtMnQdQaPsjtPMOQCghP+v k81CxBZyH/42wHjPeT0Azvc= =WRv0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: