pgadmin or pgsql bug? inserting row

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Kevin Field
Тема pgadmin or pgsql bug? inserting row
Дата
Msg-id 46BB1109.5000801@brantaero.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: pgadmin or pgsql bug? inserting row  (Dave Page <dpage@postgresql.org>)
Список pgadmin-support
I'm fairly confused by this...I have a table called 'contact' with a 
serial id column, so it automatically has this constraint:

ALTER TABLE contact  ADD CONSTRAINT contact_pkey PRIMARY KEY(id);

Now, I tried several times in 1.8.0 to add the row just by typing new 
data in the Edit Table window, and I got the same error every time.  The 
log looked like this (except with the actual name...which was unique 
BTW, not that it should matter in this context):

2007-08-07 15:45:53 127.0.0.1 dev LOG:  statement: INSERT INTO 
contact(name, parent, nickname) VALUES ('[name removed]'::text, 
'1'::integer, '[nickname removed]'::text)
2007-08-07 15:45:53 127.0.0.1 dev ERROR:  duplicate key violates unique 
constraint "contact_pkey"
2007-08-07 15:45:53 127.0.0.1 dev STATEMENT:  INSERT INTO contact(name, 
parent, nickname) VALUES ('[name removed]'::text, '1'::integer, 
'[nickname removed]'::text)

Now, I'm not sure how that's possible, given that I didn't type an ID, 
one wasn't being passed to the database, and in any case it's serial so 
this shouldn't happen, right?

To make things more interesting, I went over to my own software's UI 
that does the same thing, and it worked!  In the log, there was:

2007-08-07 15:47:04 127.0.0.1 dev LOG:  execute dbdpg_33: insert into 
contact (parent,nickname,name) values ($1,$2,$3) returning id
2007-08-07 15:47:04 127.0.0.1 dev DETAIL:  parameters: $1 = '1', $2 = 
'[nickname removed]', $3 = '[name removed]'

One other detail, after it worked I noticed that the ID returned was one 
where there had been a gap in the sequence (i.e., we had entries 1-12 
and 14-24, and the new row had id 13.)  This may be because the existing 
entries had been added with explicit id numbers but the sequence was 
probably still at a lower number.

This is pretty befuddling to me.  I'm not sure if it's a pgsql issue or 
a pgadmin one, but anyway, there's my report.

Kev


В списке pgadmin-support по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Daniel Mendes"
Дата:
Сообщение: Using Quotation marks.
Следующее
От: Dave Page
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pgadmin or pgsql bug? inserting row