-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Decibel! wrote:
>>> As long as that holds, I'm absolutely up for giving it a try. Maybe part
>>> of the disagreement has been from a misunderstanding of what a "public
>>> wiki" is. In my book, a *public* wiki is one that doesn't need a
>>> verified account. (I assume that you refer to verified account above. If
>>> not, I don't agree until you add the word verified)
>> Well, at the bare minimum we need a captcha or something similar.
>> Without that then yes, we're going to get all kinds of crap accounts.
>> Do we just have that turned off, or does mediawiki actually not support
>> that?
>
> I'd say we want email verification, so that we can contact the authors
> when needed.
Yes that is what I would expect.
Joshua D. Drake
>
> That said, I have no clue about mediawiki ;-)
>
> //Magnus
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
>
- --
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFGtO2AATb/zqfZUUQRArHwAKCDmdtrqmpwlDhSgTZTDDT/pwfZHACfQNjO
9K6sAq40IWH7M0UHd1f/bXQ=
=I1ET
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----