Re: pipe chunking vs Windows

Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>  
> Not for Wordpad though, and it's pretty universal too. And Notepad
> won't load a file of any great size anyway. Furthermore, we just can't
> have this alongside the pipe chunking protocol, so I'm inclined to
> blow it away altogether, unless there are pretty loud squawks.
> Especially for machine-readable logs, we want the log file to get
> *exactly* what we send it.
Well I'd LOVE reliably machine-readable logs, but I think that will
collide with human-readability.

Regards
Andreas