Re: (wtf) Top 20 Open Source Software Projects in the Enterprise
| От | Magnus Hagander |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: (wtf) Top 20 Open Source Software Projects in the Enterprise |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 46A65424.4000004@hagander.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: (wtf) Top 20 Open Source Software Projects in the Enterprise ("Jonah H. Harris" <jonah.harris@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: (wtf) Top 20 Open Source Software Projects in the Enterprise
|
| Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Jonah H. Harris wrote: > On 7/24/07, JoshuaKramer <josh@globalherald.net> wrote: >> On a somewhat related topic - how is MySQL 5 wrt reliability? Let's say >> you have a database that uses innodb and does type checking - is MySQL as >> robust as PGSQL when it comes to being able to pull the plug out of the >> socket (or deal with HW errors)? > > ACID-wise: > > MyISAM, no. InnoDB, Solid, and PrimeBase yes. Last I checked there was no way to make the system tables use anything other than MyISAM, which means they're not safe. That opens up a window that cannot be fixed. Unless they've actually changed that in 5.1, I think it was 5.0 when I checked it (could've been 4.x, I don't actually *use* mysql so..) //Magnus
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: