Re: Future of krb5 authentication

Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Magnus Hagander (magnus@hagander.net) wrote:
>> Certainly not "just minor adjustments", since we need to do dynamic
>> loading and checking for the functions. That's the big one, which will
> 
> If we're supporting krb5 anyway, and shipping the bits that go along
> with that, do we need to do dynamic loading and function checking?

Eh, good point. I got confused, it seems :-) Scratch that, then - we're
back to finding a good way to specify it.

//Magnus