Re: TRUNCATE TABLE
| От | Adriaan van Os |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: TRUNCATE TABLE |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 469DC30D.3060603@microbizz.nl обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: TRUNCATE TABLE (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-performance |
Tom Lane wrote: > Thus the timing issue (at least as exhibited by this script) has nothing > whatever to do with the time to delete a file, but with the time to > create one. Since the part of DROP being timed has probably got no I/O > involved at all (the tuples being touched are almost surely still in > shared buffers), it's unsurprising that it is consistently fast. In my original profiling, CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE/DROP TABLE wasn't much faster than TRUNCATE TABLE. When I try it again now, I see that DROP TABLE is consistently fast, while the timings of CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE vary as much as those of TRUNCATE TABLE. Your observations on the time needed to open a file confirm that, I think. In my test databases, autovacuum is off. Regards, Adriaan van Os
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: