Re: patch - support for multi-dimensional arrays and NULL values
От | Marek Lewczuk |
---|---|
Тема | Re: patch - support for multi-dimensional arrays and NULL values |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 469B2117.2010504@lewczuk.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: patch - support for multi-dimensional arrays and NULL values (Oliver Jowett <oliver@opencloud.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: patch - support for multi-dimensional arrays and NULL
values
|
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
Oliver Jowett pisze: > I was wondering which behaviour was right -- I thought returning > array-of-primitive was correct per the spec at the time I wrote it, and > that's why getArray() returns Object not Object[] -- but now the 1.6 > javadoc says: > >> Note: When getArray is used to materialize a base type that maps to a >> primitive data type, then it is implementation-defined whether the >> array returned is an array of that primitive data type or an array of >> Object. > > So I suppose that .. in theory .. applications should be expecting to > handle both. Ugh. My opinion is that we should keep BC either by building two different jdbc versions or checking PG version every time getArray() is used (if < 8.2 then primitive types are used, if >= 8.2 then objects). Second option is quite good, although it doesn't guaranty full BC - let assume that someone is using jdbc application that was written for pg 8.0, but after update to 8.2 the code with following statement: <code>(boolean[]) getArray()</code> would cause cast exception (Cannot cast from Boolean[] to boolean[]). Regards, ML
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: