Tom Lane wrote:
> Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> writes:
>> My first thought on fixing this issue was to simply replace all
>> instances of '\r' in pg_proc.prosrc with '\n' prior to sending it to the
>> R parser. As far as I know, any instances of '\r' embedded in a
>> syntactically valid R statement must be escaped (i.e. literally the
>> characters "\" and "r"), so that should not be a problem. But I am
>> concerned about how this potentially plays against multibyte characters.
>> Is it safe to do this, or do I need to use a mb-aware replace algorithm?
>
> It's safe, because you'll be dealing with prosrc inside the backend,
> therefore using a backend-legal encoding, and those don't have any ASCII
> aliasing problems (all bytes of an MB character must have high bit set).
Great -- I wasn't sure about that.
> However I dislike doing it exactly that way because line numbers in the
> R script will all get doubled. Unless R never reports errors in terms
> of line numbers, you'd be better off to either delete the \r characters
> or replace them with spaces.
Good point. But I need to be able to deal with Apple EOLs too -- IIRC
those can be *only* '\r'. So I guess I need to do a look-ahead whenever
I run into '\r', see if it is followed by '\n', and then munge the
string accordingly.
Joe