Re: GUC time unit spelling a bit inconsistent
| От | Brian Hurt |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: GUC time unit spelling a bit inconsistent |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 467A7399.4010201@janestcapital.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: GUC time unit spelling a bit inconsistent (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut wrote:<br /><blockquote cite="mid200706211438.55075.peter_e@gmx.net" type="cite"><pre wrap="">Am Donnerstag,21. Juni 2007 00:38 schrieb Gregory Stark: </pre><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><pre wrap="">Ithink people are worried that an 'm' in one column might mean something different than an 'm' in another column, and perhaps that is confusing. </pre></blockquote><pre wrap="">To whom? theperson writing it? </pre></blockquote><pre wrap=""> If everyone around here had gotten their way we'd already be in a situation were you could write log_rotation_age = 5m log_rotation_size = 5m </pre></blockquote><br /> Would it be a bad idea to always support the multi-character abbreviations? So the min, sec, hr, day, wk, mth, yr ar all, to my knowledge, unambiguous. As are kb, mb, gb, tb. So theabove would be:<br /> log_rotation_age = 5min<br /> log_rotation_size = 5mb<br /> edinburgh_distance=5mi<br /><br /> Brian<br/>
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: