Re: Reducing NUMERIC size for 8.3

Simon Riggs wrote:
> The objections to applying this patch originally were:
> 2. it would restrict number of digits to 508 and there are allegedly
> some people that want to store > 508 digits.
>   
If 508 digits are not enough, are1000 digits be sufficient? Both limits
appear quite arbitrary to me.

Regards,
Andreas